Hussain Shimhaz
← Articles

Air and markets

Did luxury chase the long-stay European out of the Maldives? Can the guest house bring them back?

In 2000 Italians were 22.8% of every guest in the Maldives. By 2015 their numbers had fallen 38% while the country nearly tripled in size, and the average holiday had shortened from 9.6 days to 5.9. I have a theory about why, drawn from years of experience in and around this industry. What I do not have — and nor does anyone else — is the one table that would test it: which nationality is staying where.

Hussain ShimhazSeptember 20266 min read
A Maldivian lagoon at sunset, a resort on one shore and simple island rooms with a small boat on the other. Headline: Did luxury chase the long-stay European out of the Maldives? Can the guest house bring them back?

In 2000, 106,460 Italians came to the Maldives. That was 22.8% of every guest in the country, close to one in four.

By 2015 the figure was 65,620 — down 38%, in fifteen years when the country grew from 467,000 arrivals to 1.23 million. Their share had fallen to 5.3%.

Over the same stretch the average holiday went from about 9.6 days in the late 1980s to 5.9 days in 2015, the shortest on record.

Something happened to the long-stay European. I have a theory about what. I also have no way to prove it, and neither does anybody else, which is the real subject of this piece.

The theory

In the early decades the Maldives sold a long holiday. Italians in particular came in their winter and stayed — weeks at a time, sometimes longer. The product suited that: a simple island, a house reef outside the room, a dive boat every morning, and a price a European family could sustain for a fortnight or more. In 1990, Italy and Germany between them were 41.8% of everyone who came.

Then the country moved upmarket, and it moved fast. Resorts grew larger and more luxurious, and the destination repositioned itself at the top of the world market. That was not a mistake. It raised what each guest was worth and built an industry that other countries study.

But it may have changed who could afford the holiday they actually wanted. A guest whose idea of a good trip is three weeks of diving, not four nights of marble and a spa, was being sold something else at a price that no longer allowed them to stay long. That is the theory: luxury did not lose the European, it lost the long-stay European — a different and more specific loss.

Where the theory runs into trouble

Here is the part I would rather report than hide.

Germany did not leave. Over the same fifteen years that Italy fell 38%, German arrivals rose from 77,620 to 105,130 — up 35%. They are at 167,840 today. If luxury and price had chased away the European long-stay traveller as a class, Germany should have gone with Italy. It did not.

And the price evidence is not there either. The earliest published figure for what the country earns per bed night is 2011. From 2011 to 2019 it barely moved — $298 to $295. It has risen since, to $406 last year, but that is after the pandemic, long after the Italian decline. For the years that actually matter to this question, there is no published price history at all.

So the honest position is that Italy halved, Germany grew, the holiday got shorter, and the explanation could be price, or Italian economic conditions after 2008, or charter routes that stopped flying, or a product that stopped suiting one nationality and kept suiting another. All four are plausible. Not one of them can be tested against published data.

Can the guest house bring them back?

This is the question I find more interesting, because it is about the next ten years rather than the last twenty.

In 2010 the Maldives had 22 guest houses with 470 beds. By 2015 there were 303. Today there are 973, with 16,820 beds — roughly one bed in four in the country — spread across more than a hundred inhabited islands.

What they offer is close to what the country used to offer and stopped: a bed near a reef, at a price that lets you stay for weeks instead of days, with a dive centre round the corner and an island to walk around in the evening. If the long-stay European was priced out of one product, this is the obvious door back in.

And on the surface, something is coming back. Italy is above 150,000 guests again. Europe's share has recovered from 43.4% in 2015 to 59.3% last year.

But I cannot tell you whether those two facts are connected, because nothing published says whether a single one of those Europeans slept in a guest house.

There is worse. Average stay is not published by market or by type of property either — only as one national figure. So even the founding claim of this article, that Italians used to stay far longer than the average, is something I believe from experience and cannot demonstrate. And that single national figure is not encouraging: after the pandemic pushed it up to 8.8 days in 2021, it has fallen every year since — 8.0, 7.6, 7.4, and 7.0 last year.

The long stay may be coming back through the guest house door. It may equally be that guest houses are filling with short-stay regional visitors while the long holiday continues to disappear underneath the average. Those are opposite futures for a thousand small businesses, and the published statistics cannot separate them.

What is actually missing

Not much, and that is the frustrating part. The country publishes a great deal — 347 tourism series, most monthly, many running back to 1988, free to anyone. Arrivals by more than a hundred nationalities. Bed nights, occupancy and capacity by type of property. The Ministry's yearbook adds capacity resort by resort and revenue by segment. I spent a week reading it and checking it against the yearbook; where they overlap they agree to the last figure.

Two columns exist. They are never placed side by side.

Which nationality is staying where. Arrivals and bed nights, by market, split between resorts, guest houses, hotels and safari vessels. Monthly if possible, annually if not.

That one table would answer this article. It would show whether the guest house boom is repatriating the European long-stay diver or building something entirely different. It would tell a liveaboard owner which market to chase into a 23.8% occupancy. It would tell an island council whether twenty more rooms should be aimed at Milan or Mumbai. And it would let the country's marketing money be spent on evidence rather than on the same word of mouth the rest of us are working from.

What I am not saying

I am not saying anyone is hiding anything. The likeliest explanation is that nobody has ever been asked to produce it, and the two halves are collected by different people for different reasons.

Nor am I saying the move upmarket was wrong. It built the modern Maldives and it pays for most of what the state spends.

I am saying that a country whose entire economy rests on tourism should be able to answer a simple question about its own guests: who is staying where, and for how long. We cannot. So every one of us — resort, guest house, liveaboard, ministry, promotion board — is making thirty-year decisions on a hunch, mine included.

If the table exists, show me and I will say so publicly. If it does not, it should.


Where the numbers come from: the Ministry of Tourism and Environment's monthly statistics, published through the MMA Statistics Database, for arrivals by market, average stay, bed nights, occupancy and capacity; the Maldives Monetary Authority for travel receipts; and the Ministry's Tourism Yearbook 2025 for revenue by type of property. Annual average stay and occupancy are the mean of the twelve months; beds and establishments are the position at year end; arrivals, bed nights and receipts are the year's total. The 2020 stay figure is excluded throughout as a pandemic artefact.

Hussain ShimhazSeptember 2026